PR. PATHSHALA MIRZAPUR PS 229
PRASHANT AHIRWAR
BSPBahujan Samaj Party161 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 161 | 35.31% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 154 | 33.77% | |
| 3 | SAROJ | ADS | 113 | 24.78% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 6 | 1.32% | |
| 5 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 8 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 10 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 1 | 0.22% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 456 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 161 | 35.31% | 1 | 57 | Average |
| SP | 154 | 33.77% | 2 | 199 | Average |
| ADS | 113 | 24.78% | 3 | 309 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 1.32% | 4 | 230 | Poor |
| AAD | 4 | 0.88% | 6 | 120 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.88% | 5 | 203 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.88% | 7 | 173 | Poor |
| SJP | 3 | 0.66% | 9 | 77 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.66% | 8 | 176 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.44% | 10 | 144 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.22% | 12 | 259 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 211 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.