CAPTON SUKHWASI SINGH SMARAK JANTA MAHAVIDYALAY GHATAMPUR ROOM NO. 4 PS 222
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)286 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 286 | 47.83% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 120 | 20.07% | |
| 3 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 107 | 17.89% | |
| 4 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 71 | 11.87% | |
| 5 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 6 | 1.00% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 598 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 286 | 47.83% | 1 | 91 | Strong |
| SP | 120 | 20.07% | 2 | 246 | Weak |
| INC | 107 | 17.89% | 3 | 2 | Weak |
| BSP | 71 | 11.87% | 4 | 172 | Weak |
| AAP | 6 | 1.00% | 5 | 60 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 305 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 133 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 281 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 242 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 257 | Poor |
| AAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 363 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 352 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.