CAPTON SUKHWASI SINGH SMARAK JANTA MAHAVIDYALAY GHATAMPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 220
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party542 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 542 | 81.14% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 96 | 14.37% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 11 | 1.65% | |
| 4 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 668 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 542 | 81.14% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| ADS | 96 | 14.37% | 2 | 327 | Weak |
| BSP | 11 | 1.65% | 3 | 322 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.20% | 4 | 50 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.75% | 5 | 271 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.45% | 6 | 258 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 293 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 241 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 333 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 351 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 330 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 362 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.