POORV M. VIDHYALAY GHATAMPUR ROOM N. 1 PS 209
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)340 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 340 | 63.08% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 176 | 32.65% | |
| 3 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 7 | 1.30% | |
| 4 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 5 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 7 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 539 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 340 | 63.08% | 1 | 44 | Strong |
| SP | 176 | 32.65% | 2 | 156 | Average |
| INC | 7 | 1.30% | 3 | 194 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.74% | 4 | 52 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.56% | 7 | 378 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.56% | 5 | 174 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.56% | 6 | 254 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.37% | 8 | 180 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 289 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 375 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 346 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.