PR. PATHSHALA PATARA ROOM NO.2 PS 165
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)228 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 228 | 33.53% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 214 | 31.47% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 203 | 29.85% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 11 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 680 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 228 | 33.53% | 1 | 167 | Average |
| SP | 214 | 31.47% | 2 | 109 | Average |
| BSP | 203 | 29.85% | 3 | 36 | Average |
| INC | 11 | 1.62% | 4 | 95 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.88% | 5 | 88 | Poor |
| AAD | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 74 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.59% | 7 | 116 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.59% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.44% | 9 | 243 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 202 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 225 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.