PR. PATHSHALA MAKHAULI ROOM NO. 1 PS 12
PRASHANT AHIRWAR
BSPBahujan Samaj Party282 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 282 | 50.81% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 183 | 32.97% | |
| 3 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 61 | 10.99% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 1.80% | |
| 5 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 6 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 8 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 555 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 282 | 50.81% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| ADS | 183 | 32.97% | 2 | 218 | Average |
| SP | 61 | 10.99% | 3 | 337 | Weak |
| NOTA | 10 | 1.80% | 4 | 23 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.72% | 5 | 102 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.72% | 6 | 172 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.72% | 7 | 289 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.54% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 103 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 213 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 252 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 290 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.