JR. H. SCHOOL AKBARPUR BEERBAL BANGAR ROOM NO. 3 PS 115
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)162 votes at this polling station
over PRASHANT AHIRWAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 162 | 38.21% | |
| 2 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 161 | 37.97% | |
| 3 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 75 | 17.69% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 2.36% | |
| 5 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 424 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 162 | 38.21% | 1 | 249 | Average |
| BSP | 161 | 37.97% | 2 | 55 | Average |
| SP | 75 | 17.69% | 3 | 321 | Weak |
| NOTA | 10 | 2.36% | 4 | 27 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.94% | 5 | 181 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.71% | 6 | 329 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.47% | 10 | 165 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.47% | 7 | 221 | Poor |
| AAD | 2 | 0.47% | 8 | 202 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 121 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.24% | 11 | 213 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 294 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.