PR. PATHSHALA DAULATPUR GHATAMPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 109
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party294 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 294 | 48.51% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 163 | 26.90% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 127 | 20.96% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 9 | 1.49% | |
| 5 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 6 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 606 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 294 | 48.51% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| ADS | 163 | 26.90% | 2 | 246 | Average |
| BSP | 127 | 20.96% | 3 | 87 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 1.49% | 4 | 124 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.66% | 5 | 109 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 162 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 265 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 118 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 187 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 211 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 272 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 372 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.