CHHAWNI PARISHAD JR. H. SCHOOL LALKURTI ROOM NO 3 PS 27
RAGHUNANDAN SINGH BHADAURIYA
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY322 votes at this polling station
over SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAGHUNANDAN SINGH BHADAURIYA | BJP | 322 | 83.42% | |
| 2 | SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI | INC | 31 | 8.03% | |
| 3 | MOHAMMAD HASAN 'ROOMI' | SP | 16 | 4.15% | |
| 4 | RASHID JAMAL | AAP | 5 | 1.30% | |
| 5 | MOHAMMAD SHAFI | BSP | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | MOINUDDIN | AIMEI | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | ASHISH SHUKLA | BSP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | DEVI PRASAD | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 9 | MOHD MERAJ | RUC | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | JAMSED | JAP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | RAMESH | ABSP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | MUKESH PAL | RSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 386 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 322 | 83.20% | 1 | 104 | Strong |
| INC | 31 | 8.01% | 2 | 149 | Poor |
| SP | 16 | 4.13% | 3 | 350 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.29% | 4 | 16 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.78% | 5 | 241 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 2 | 0.52% | 6 | 141 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.52% | 7 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.52% | 8 | 22 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 16 | Poor |
| ABSP | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 40 | Poor |
| RUC | 1 | 0.26% | 11 | 25 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 101 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 216, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.