SANA PUBLIC SCHOOL DARGHA SARIF IMAM CHOK JAJMAU ROOM NO 4 PS 173
MOHAMMAD HASAN 'ROOMI'
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY576 votes at this polling station
over SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHAMMAD HASAN 'ROOMI' | SP | 576 | 90.28% | |
| 2 | SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI | INC | 23 | 3.61% | |
| 3 | MOINUDDIN | AIMEI | 17 | 2.66% | |
| 4 | RAGHUNANDAN SINGH BHADAURIYA | BJP | 14 | 2.19% | |
| 5 | MOHAMMAD SHAFI | BSP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | MUKESH PAL | RSP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | DEVI PRASAD | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | MOHD MERAJ | RUC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | RAMESH | ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RASHID JAMAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHISH SHUKLA | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAMSED | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 638 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 576 | 90.28% | 1 | 17 | Strong |
| INC | 23 | 3.61% | 2 | 216 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 17 | 2.66% | 3 | 6 | Poor |
| BJP | 14 | 2.19% | 4 | 304 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.63% | 5 | 229 | Poor |
| RSP | 3 | 0.47% | 6 | 10 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 103 | Poor |
| RUC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 215 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 289 | Poor |
| ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 242 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 203 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 216, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.