MADARSA DARUL-ULOOM SHAH-ALA KUDRATIYA JAJMAU ROOM NO 4 PS 169
MOHAMMAD HASAN 'ROOMI'
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY373 votes at this polling station
over SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOHAMMAD HASAN 'ROOMI' | SP | 373 | 85.35% | |
| 2 | SOHIL AKHTAR ANSARI | INC | 34 | 7.78% | |
| 3 | RAGHUNANDAN SINGH BHADAURIYA | BJP | 12 | 2.75% | |
| 4 | MOINUDDIN | AIMEI | 11 | 2.52% | |
| 5 | MOHAMMAD SHAFI | BSP | 5 | 1.14% | |
| 6 | MUKESH PAL | RSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | ASHISH SHUKLA | BSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | JAMSED | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | RAMESH | ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RASHID JAMAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DEVI PRASAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MOHD MERAJ | RUC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 437 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 373 | 84.97% | 1 | 117 | Strong |
| INC | 34 | 7.74% | 2 | 130 | Poor |
| BJP | 12 | 2.73% | 3 | 310 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 11 | 2.51% | 4 | 18 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 1.14% | 5 | 201 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.23% | 6 | 90 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| RUC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 212 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 255 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 201 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 286 | Poor |
| ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 232 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 216, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.