Polling station 460 PS 460
Imran Bin Zafar
BSPBSP229 votes at this polling station
over Akhilesh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Imran Bin Zafar | BSP | 229 | 65.06% | |
| 2 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP | 103 | 29.26% | |
| 3 | Subrat Pathak | BJP | 12 | 3.41% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 5 | Yadvendra Kishor | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 6 | Lalit Kumari | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | Alok Verma | RSSP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | Subhash Chandra | AIFB | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Irfan Ali | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | Purushottam Tiwari | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Bhanu Pratap Singh Dohre | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Pramod Kumar Yadav | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Shailendra Kumar | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sunil | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Sinod Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | Raj Katheria | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 352 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 229 | 65.06% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| SP | 103 | 29.26% | 2 | 455 | Average |
| BJP | 12 | 3.41% | 3 | 474 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.85% | 4 | 342 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.85% | 5 | 200 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 292 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.28% | 6 | 130 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 464 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 470 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 464 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 198, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2024 Lok Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.