Polling station 435 PS 435
Akhilesh Yadav
SPSP499 votes at this polling station
over Subrat Pathak (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP | 499 | 67.52% | |
| 2 | Subrat Pathak | BJP | 169 | 22.87% | |
| 3 | Imran Bin Zafar | BSP | 58 | 7.85% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 5 | Lalit Kumari | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | Alok Verma | RSSP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | Pramod Kumar Yadav | BKD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | Subhash Chandra | AIFB | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Sinod Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Purushottam Tiwari | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Bhanu Pratap Singh Dohre | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Yadvendra Kishor | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raj Katheria | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Irfan Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Shailendra Kumar | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | Sunil | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 739 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 499 | 67.52% | 1 | 45 | Strong |
| BJP | 169 | 22.87% | 2 | 304 | Weak |
| BSP | 58 | 7.85% | 3 | 118 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.68% | 4 | 225 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.54% | 5 | 114 | Poor |
| RSSP | 2 | 0.27% | 6 | 132 | Poor |
| BKD | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 107 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 125 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 451 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 444 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 198, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2024 Lok Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.