Polling station 61 PS 61
Subrat Pathak
BJPBJP414 votes at this polling station
over Akhilesh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Subrat Pathak | BJP | 414 | 59.65% | |
| 2 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP | 245 | 35.30% | |
| 3 | Imran Bin Zafar | BSP | 25 | 3.60% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 5 | Yadvendra Kishor | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 6 | Lalit Kumari | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | Raj Katheria | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | Purushottam Tiwari | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Alok Verma | RSSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Pramod Kumar Yadav | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Shailendra Kumar | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Sunil | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Subhash Chandra | AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Irfan Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Bhanu Pratap Singh Dohre | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | Sinod Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 694 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 414 | 59.65% | 1 | 25 | Strong |
| SP | 245 | 35.30% | 2 | 223 | Average |
| BSP | 25 | 3.60% | 3 | 130 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.86% | 4 | 73 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.43% | 5 | 88 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.14% | 6 | 227 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 121 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 175 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 118 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 154 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 197, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2024 Lok Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.