P.S. BHARAPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 93
Archana Pandey
""270 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 270 | 64.29% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 72 | 17.14% | |
| 3 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 47 | 11.19% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 26 | 6.19% | |
| 5 | Imran Vegam | " | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sanjay | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 420 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 373 | 87.97% | 1 | 122 | Strong |
| SP | 372 | 52.47% | 1 | 140 | Strong |
| BJP | 275 | 38.79% | 2 | 153 | Average |
| :" | 47 | 11.08% | 2 | 539 | Weak |
| BSP | 42 | 5.92% | 3 | 81 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.13% | 4 | 53 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.85% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| RSSP | 4 | 0.56% | 6 | 56 | Poor |
| BKPP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 8 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 158 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 160 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 183 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.