P.S. JAFRABAD ROOM NO. 1 PS 77
Archana Pandey
""376 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 376 | 86.84% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 47 | 10.85% | |
| 3 | Vijay Kumar | " | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 433 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 386 | 88.74% | 1 | 112 | Strong |
| BJP | 351 | 71.93% | 1 | 70 | Strong |
| SP | 110 | 22.54% | 2 | 496 | Weak |
| :" | 47 | 10.80% | 2 | 538 | Weak |
| BSP | 14 | 2.87% | 3 | 188 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.02% | 4 | 132 | Poor |
| RSSP | 5 | 1.02% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 18 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 301 | Poor |
| BKD | 1 | 0.20% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 187 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 170 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.