P.S. RASULABAD PS 76
Archana Pandey
""200 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 200 | 53.19% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 111 | 29.52% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 58 | 15.43% | |
| 4 | Arjuman | " | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 5 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 376 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 289 | 51.89% | 1 | 132 | Strong |
| " | 265 | 70.11% | 1 | 304 | Strong |
| SP | 230 | 41.29% | 2 | 308 | Strong |
| :" | 111 | 29.37% | 2 | 413 | Average |
| RSSP | 21 | 3.77% | 3 | 5 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.26% | 4 | 74 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.90% | 5 | 33 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.54% | 6 | 399 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 17 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 33 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 148 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 186 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.