P.S. BHOHJPUR PS 72
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"201 votes at this polling station
over Archana Pandey (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 201 | 61.09% | |
| 2 | Archana Pandey | " | 123 | 37.39% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 3 | 0.91% | |
| 4 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 5 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 6 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sanjay | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 329 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 287 | 65.68% | 1 | 138 | Strong |
| :" | 201 | 60.91% | 1 | 247 | Strong |
| SP | 138 | 31.58% | 2 | 457 | Average |
| " | 128 | 38.79% | 2 | 470 | Average |
| BSP | 3 | 0.69% | 3 | 398 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.69% | 4 | 231 | Poor |
| RSSP | 3 | 0.69% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 181 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 31 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 145 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 184 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 141 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.