P.S. SARAIYA PS 62
Archana Pandey
""389 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 389 | 68.85% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 88 | 15.58% | |
| 3 | Mohd Chandan | " | 83 | 14.69% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 6 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 565 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 889 | 97.59% | 1 | 2 | Strong |
| " | 477 | 83.98% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| :" | 88 | 15.49% | 2 | 464 | Weak |
| BSP | 9 | 0.99% | 2 | 244 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 0.77% | 3 | 6 | Poor |
| BJP | 4 | 0.44% | 4 | 534 | Poor |
| BKD | 1 | 0.11% | 5 | 21 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.11% | 6 | 394 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 363 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 176 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 132 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 160 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.