U.P.S. BIRRA PS 540
Archana Pandey
""426 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 426 | 72.57% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 150 | 25.55% | |
| 3 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 0.85% | |
| 4 | Imran Vegam | " | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 5 | Arjuman | " | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 6 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 7 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 587 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 437 | 73.69% | 1 | 65 | Strong |
| BJP | 273 | 54.27% | 1 | 155 | Strong |
| SP | 207 | 41.15% | 2 | 334 | Strong |
| :" | 150 | 25.30% | 2 | 346 | Average |
| BSP | 10 | 1.99% | 3 | 238 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.99% | 4 | 162 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.60% | 5 | 165 | Poor |
| RSSP | 3 | 0.60% | 6 | 115 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 109 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 121 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 540 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 541 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.