Polling station 50 PS 50
Akhilesh Yadav
SPSP455 votes at this polling station
over Subrat Pathak (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP | 455 | 95.39% | |
| 2 | Subrat Pathak | BJP | 9 | 1.89% | |
| 3 | Imran Bin Zafar | BSP | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 5 | Lalit Kumari | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 6 | Sinod Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | Yadvendra Kishor | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | Sunil | BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Subhash Chandra | AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Irfan Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Purushottam Tiwari | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Bhanu Pratap Singh Dohre | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Alok Verma | RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Pramod Kumar Yadav | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Shailendra Kumar | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | Raj Katheria | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 477 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 455 | 95.39% | 1 | 90 | Strong |
| BJP | 9 | 1.89% | 2 | 520 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.47% | 3 | 277 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.63% | 4 | 228 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.42% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 149 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 130 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 166 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 361 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2024 Lok Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.