P.S. MAJPURVA NO.2 PS 483
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"421 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 421 | 89.19% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 22 | 4.66% | |
| 3 | Archana Pandey | " | 18 | 3.81% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 9 | 1.91% | |
| 5 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 6 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | Sanjay | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 472 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| :" | 421 | 89.01% | 1 | 52 | Strong |
| BJP | 367 | 74.44% | 1 | 59 | Strong |
| SP | 125 | 25.35% | 2 | 481 | Average |
| " | 51 | 10.78% | 2 | 527 | Weak |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.20% | 3 | 322 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 497 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 489 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 501 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 488 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 542 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 535 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 530 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.