P.S. BHUDHA PS 461
Archana Pandey
""307 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 307 | 46.03% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 182 | 27.29% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 137 | 20.54% | |
| 4 | Vijay Kumar | " | 11 | 1.65% | |
| 5 | Mohd Chandan | " | 9 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | Nurul Shams | " | 6 | 0.90% | |
| 7 | Sanjay | " | 6 | 0.90% | |
| 8 | Imran Vegam | " | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | Laloo Yadav | " | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 667 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 563 | 79.97% | 1 | 50 | Strong |
| " | 485 | 72.50% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| :" | 182 | 27.20% | 2 | 279 | Average |
| BSP | 98 | 13.92% | 2 | 20 | Weak |
| BJP | 37 | 5.26% | 3 | 470 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.57% | 4 | 212 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.28% | 5 | 263 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 507 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 470 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 483 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 470 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 480 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.