P.S. TAMIYAMAU PS 416
Archana Pandey
""248 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 248 | 59.90% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 164 | 39.61% | |
| 3 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 4 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 5 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 6 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 414 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 370 | 89.81% | 1 | 142 | Strong |
| " | 250 | 60.39% | 1 | 337 | Strong |
| :" | 164 | 39.61% | 2 | 322 | Average |
| BSP | 31 | 7.52% | 2 | 115 | Poor |
| BJP | 9 | 2.18% | 3 | 523 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.24% | 4 | 441 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 5 | 395 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 480 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 431 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 446 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 429 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 442 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.