P.S. GURGUJPUR PS 412
Archana Pandey
""197 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 197 | 63.14% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 80 | 25.64% | |
| 3 | Vijay Kumar | " | 14 | 4.49% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 12 | 3.85% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 1.60% | |
| 6 | Nurul Shams | " | 2 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | Mohd Chandan | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 312 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 420 | 94.17% | 1 | 114 | Strong |
| " | 232 | 73.89% | 1 | 360 | Strong |
| :" | 80 | 25.48% | 2 | 484 | Average |
| BJP | 17 | 3.81% | 2 | 501 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 1.12% | 3 | 335 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.45% | 4 | 362 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.22% | 6 | 394 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.22% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 477 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 427 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 442 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 425 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.