P.S. MADHVAPUR PS 409
Archana Pandey
""276 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 276 | 78.63% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 60 | 17.09% | |
| 3 | Vijay Kumar | " | 8 | 2.28% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 5 | 1.42% | |
| 5 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 6 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 351 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 521 | 89.83% | 1 | 67 | Strong |
| " | 291 | 82.44% | 1 | 257 | Strong |
| :" | 60 | 17.00% | 2 | 523 | Weak |
| BJP | 42 | 7.24% | 2 | 462 | Poor |
| BSP | 12 | 2.07% | 3 | 213 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.52% | 4 | 148 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.17% | 6 | 303 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 5 | 439 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 424 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 439 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 423 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 437 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.