P.S. AKRAMABAD PS 392
Archana Pandey
""299 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 299 | 52.64% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 217 | 38.20% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 23 | 4.05% | |
| 4 | Mohd Chandan | " | 18 | 3.17% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 6 | Arjuman | " | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 568 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 351 | 61.58% | 1 | 150 | Strong |
| :" | 217 | 38.07% | 2 | 227 | Average |
| BJP | 193 | 62.06% | 1 | 284 | Strong |
| SP | 81 | 26.05% | 2 | 521 | Average |
| BSP | 21 | 6.75% | 3 | 147 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 2.89% | 4 | 48 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.64% | 6 | 246 | Poor |
| RSSP | 2 | 0.64% | 7 | 161 | Poor |
| AIFB | 2 | 0.64% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.32% | 8 | 62 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 409 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 426 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.