P.S. BIRAULI PS 310
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"444 votes at this polling station
over Archana Pandey (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 444 | 60.41% | |
| 2 | Archana Pandey | " | 274 | 37.28% | |
| 3 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 4 | Vijay Kumar | " | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 5 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 6 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 7 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 735 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| :" | 444 | 60.08% | 1 | 43 | Strong |
| " | 291 | 39.38% | 2 | 255 | Average |
| BJP | 275 | 60.44% | 1 | 154 | Strong |
| SP | 134 | 29.45% | 2 | 465 | Average |
| BSP | 35 | 7.69% | 3 | 101 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.54% | 4 | 86 | Poor |
| RSSP | 2 | 0.44% | 5 | 148 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.22% | 6 | 68 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 364 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 344 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 371 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 345 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.