P.S. KISHANPUR PS 302
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"338 votes at this polling station
over Archana Pandey (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 338 | 52.98% | |
| 2 | Archana Pandey | " | 181 | 28.37% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 108 | 16.93% | |
| 4 | Vijay Kumar | " | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 5 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 6 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | Mohd Chandan | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Sanjay | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 638 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 591 | 79.54% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| :" | 338 | 52.65% | 1 | 94 | Strong |
| " | 300 | 46.73% | 2 | 243 | Strong |
| BJP | 113 | 15.21% | 2 | 397 | Weak |
| BSP | 28 | 3.77% | 3 | 121 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 0.94% | 4 | 85 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.54% | 5 | 76 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 447 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 337 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 364 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 337 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 354 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.