P.S. ACHNAKAPUR PS 283
Archana Pandey
""285 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 285 | 55.23% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 139 | 26.94% | |
| 3 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 85 | 16.47% | |
| 4 | Sanjay | " | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 5 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 516 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 431 | 82.88% | 1 | 72 | Strong |
| BJP | 367 | 65.77% | 1 | 58 | Strong |
| SP | 131 | 23.48% | 2 | 471 | Weak |
| :" | 85 | 16.35% | 2 | 472 | Weak |
| BSP | 37 | 6.63% | 3 | 96 | Poor |
| RSSP | 11 | 1.97% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.43% | 5 | 58 | Poor |
| BKPP | 2 | 0.36% | 6 | 16 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 358 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 64 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 321 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.