P.P. HAYATNAGAR PS 281
Archana Pandey
""206 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 206 | 38.58% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 131 | 24.53% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 97 | 18.16% | |
| 4 | Mohd Chandan | " | 79 | 14.79% | |
| 5 | Vijay Kumar | " | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 6 | Imran Vegam | " | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | Nurul Shams | " | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | Sanjay | " | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | Amol Dixit | " | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 534 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 403 | 75.19% | 1 | 99 | Strong |
| BJP | 359 | 56.80% | 1 | 68 | Strong |
| SP | 258 | 40.82% | 2 | 276 | Strong |
| :" | 131 | 24.44% | 2 | 384 | Weak |
| BSP | 7 | 1.11% | 3 | 286 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.63% | 4 | 194 | Poor |
| BKPP | 2 | 0.32% | 5 | 15 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 357 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 438 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 319 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 337 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.