Polling station 269 PS 269
Akhilesh Yadav
SPSP373 votes at this polling station
over Imran Bin Zafar (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP | 373 | 87.56% | |
| 2 | Imran Bin Zafar | BSP | 33 | 7.75% | |
| 3 | Subrat Pathak | BJP | 17 | 3.99% | |
| 4 | Alok Verma | RSSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 5 | Lalit Kumari | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | Sinod Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Pramod Kumar Yadav | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Shailendra Kumar | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sunil | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Subhash Chandra | AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Irfan Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Purushottam Tiwari | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Bhanu Pratap Singh Dohre | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Yadvendra Kishor | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | Raj Katheria | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 373 | 87.56% | 1 | 139 | Strong |
| BSP | 33 | 7.75% | 2 | 107 | Poor |
| BJP | 17 | 3.99% | 3 | 500 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 4 | 425 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | 5 | 353 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.23% | 6 | 261 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 309 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 335 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 312 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 327 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2024 Lok Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.