P.S. RAIPUR PS 241
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"123 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 123 | 38.44% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 106 | 33.12% | |
| 3 | Archana Pandey | " | 49 | 15.31% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 31 | 9.69% | |
| 5 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Laloo Yadav | " | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 320 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 336 | 48.55% | 1 | 86 | Strong |
| SP | 321 | 46.39% | 2 | 189 | Strong |
| " | 197 | 61.37% | 1 | 402 | Strong |
| :" | 123 | 38.32% | 2 | 397 | Average |
| BSP | 26 | 3.76% | 3 | 127 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.58% | 4 | 188 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.58% | 5 | 71 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.14% | 6 | 63 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 289 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 282 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 423 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 307 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.