P.S.JASUAMAI ROOM NO. 2 PS 240
Archana Pandey
""234 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 234 | 72.67% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 69 | 21.43% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 5 | 1.55% | |
| 4 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 1.55% | |
| 5 | Vijay Kumar | " | 3 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Mohd Chandan | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 322 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 615 | 80.29% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| " | 253 | 77.61% | 1 | 330 | Strong |
| BJP | 101 | 13.19% | 2 | 409 | Weak |
| :" | 69 | 21.17% | 2 | 506 | Weak |
| BSP | 33 | 4.31% | 3 | 106 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.78% | 4 | 111 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.78% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| RSSP | 4 | 0.52% | 6 | 62 | Poor |
| BKD | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 312 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 288 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 306 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.