P.S. PATKULIYA PS 229
Archana Pandey
""196 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 196 | 39.52% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 165 | 33.27% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 120 | 24.19% | |
| 4 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 1.01% | |
| 5 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 6 | Vijay Kumar | " | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | Arjuman | " | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd Chandan | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 496 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 516 | 68.71% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| " | 331 | 65.81% | 1 | 178 | Strong |
| SP | 201 | 26.76% | 2 | 348 | Average |
| :" | 165 | 32.80% | 2 | 319 | Average |
| RSSP | 17 | 2.26% | 3 | 6 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 0.80% | 4 | 301 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.67% | 5 | 139 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.40% | 6 | 120 | Poor |
| AIFB | 2 | 0.27% | 7 | 12 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 60 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 279 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 273 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.