P.S. NAGLA BHAUSE PS 224
Archana Pandey
""180 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 180 | 58.25% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 105 | 33.98% | |
| 3 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 6 | 1.94% | |
| 4 | Mohd Chandan | " | 5 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 6 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 3 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | Amol Dixit | " | 2 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | Laloo Yadav | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 11 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 12 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 309 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 375 | 77.16% | 1 | 54 | Strong |
| " | 204 | 64.97% | 1 | 389 | Strong |
| :" | 105 | 33.44% | 2 | 426 | Average |
| SP | 97 | 19.96% | 2 | 509 | Weak |
| IND | 8 | 1.65% | 3 | 56 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.62% | 4 | 410 | Poor |
| RSSP | 2 | 0.41% | 5 | 140 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 344 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 293 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 269 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 299 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 274 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.