P.S. SAISARPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 19
Archana Pandey
""178 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 178 | 47.34% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 164 | 43.62% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 17 | 4.52% | |
| 4 | Mohd Chandan | " | 14 | 3.72% | |
| 5 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | Nurul Shams | " | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | Sanjay | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 376 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 212 | 56.38% | 1 | 380 | Strong |
| :" | 164 | 43.62% | 2 | 320 | Strong |
| AIFB | 0 | — | 1 | 123 | Poor |
| BJP | 0 | — | 2 | 545 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | — | 3 | 102 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | — | 4 | 139 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | — | 5 | 95 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | — | 6 | 529 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | — | 7 | 477 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | — | 8 | 439 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | — | 9 | 347 | Poor |
| SP | 0 | — | 10 | 547 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.