P.S. BALRAMPUR PS 139
Archana Pandey
""291 votes at this polling station
over Arvind Singh Yadav (:")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 291 | 75.58% | |
| 2 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 84 | 21.82% | |
| 3 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 8 | 2.08% | |
| 4 | Mohd Chandan | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 5 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 6 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Amol Dixit | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Imran Vegam | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Vijay Kumar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 385 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| " | 301 | 77.98% | 1 | 235 | Strong |
| SP | 219 | 52.27% | 1 | 320 | Strong |
| BSP | 119 | 28.40% | 2 | 11 | Average |
| :" | 84 | 21.76% | 2 | 474 | Weak |
| BJP | 68 | 16.23% | 3 | 441 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 1.67% | 4 | 78 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.48% | 6 | 195 | Poor |
| BKPP | 2 | 0.48% | 5 | 10 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 218 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 200 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 201 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.