P.S. RASOOLPUR PS 119
Archana Pandey
""132 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archana Pandey | " | 132 | 34.20% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 115 | 29.79% | |
| 3 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 104 | 26.94% | |
| 4 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 30 | 7.77% | |
| 5 | Vijay Kumar | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 6 | Amol Dixit | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 7 | Imran Vegam | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | Sanjay | " | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Laloo Yadav | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Nurul Shams | " | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Arjuman | " | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 386 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 348 | 62.59% | 1 | 163 | Strong |
| " | 282 | 72.68% | 1 | 274 | Strong |
| BJP | 157 | 28.24% | 2 | 336 | Average |
| :" | 104 | 26.80% | 2 | 428 | Average |
| BSP | 44 | 7.91% | 3 | 73 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.90% | 4 | 135 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.36% | 5 | 189 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 385 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 182 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 214 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 181 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 206 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.