BARATGHAR ATIYA PS 112
Arvind Singh Yadav
:":"306 votes at this polling station
over Mohd Chandan (")
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvind Singh Yadav | :" | 306 | 50.41% | |
| 2 | Mohd Chandan | " | 129 | 21.25% | |
| 3 | Archana Pandey | " | 126 | 20.76% | |
| 4 | Vijay Kumar | " | 9 | 1.48% | |
| 5 | Waheeda Bano urf Juhi Sultan | " | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | Ankit Kumar Pal | " | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | Sanjay | " | 5 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | Amol Dixit | " | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | Imran Vegam | " | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 10 | Nurul Shams | " | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 11 | Arjuman | " | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 12 | Laloo Yadav | " | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 13 | Mohd.Kamar | " | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 14 | Dr Chandra Kant Yadav | " | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 607 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 319 | 68.31% | 1 | 191 | Strong |
| :" | 306 | 49.84% | 1 | 121 | Strong |
| " | 301 | 49.02% | 2 | 234 | Strong |
| BJP | 137 | 29.34% | 2 | 361 | Average |
| BSP | 4 | 0.86% | 3 | 353 | Poor |
| BKPP | 3 | 0.64% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.64% | 5 | 102 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 397 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 174 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 176 | Poor |
| AIFB | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 200 | Poor |
| RSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 383 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 196, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.