P.S.MADANAPUR PS 140
Arshad Jamal Siddiqui (Samajwadi Party)
SPSP587 votes at this polling station
over Shailendra Singh (Independent) (INDT)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arshad Jamal Siddiqui (Samajwadi Party) | SP | 587 | 96.55% | |
| 2 | Shailendra Singh (Independent) | INDT | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 3 | Archana Rathaur (Indian National Congress) | INC | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 4 | Nagendra Singh Rathour (Bharatiya Janata Party) | BJP | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 5 | Rejvan (Independent) | INDT | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 6 | Alok Verma (Bahujan Samaj Party) | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Talib Siddiqui (All India Majlis-E- Ittehadul Muslimeen) | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ramteerth(Bharatiya Subhash Sena) | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Rahul(Aam Aadmi Party) | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Alok (Independent) | INDT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ajaj Ahmad (Independent) | INDT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 608 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 587 | 96.55% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| INDT | 9 | 1.48% | 2 | 37 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.99% | 4 | 89 | Poor |
| BJP | 6 | 0.99% | 3 | 360 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 366 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 237 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 225 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 351 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 195, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.