GIRLS .P.P. DEHRIYANWAN ROOM N0 1 PS 250
SURESH KUMAR
COL 2121185 votes at this polling station
over JITENDAR KUMAR (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SURESH KUMAR | COL 21 | 185 | 41.67% | |
| 2 | JITENDAR KUMAR | COL 12 | 106 | 23.87% | |
| 3 | VIJAY KUMAR | COL 15 | 67 | 15.09% | |
| 4 | VIMLESH KUMARI | COL 18 | 52 | 11.71% | |
| 5 | TILAKRAJ | COL 24 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | PUTTI LAL | COL 36 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 7 | MAHENDRA RAWAT | COL 39 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 8 | SHUSHIL KUMAR | COL 42 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 9 | BABULAL | COL 30 | 4 | 0.90% | |
| 10 | SIYARAM | COL 33 | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 11 | HARISHCHANDRA | COL 45 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 12 | DINESH KUMAR | COL 27 | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 444 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 185 | 41.11% | 1 | 238 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 106 | 23.56% | 2 | 5 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 67 | 14.89% | 3 | 323 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 52 | 11.56% | 4 | 219 | Weak |
| COL 24 | 7 | 1.56% | 5 | 78 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 7 | 1.56% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 5 | 1.11% | 7 | 96 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 5 | 1.11% | 8 | 17 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 4 | 0.89% | 9 | 5 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.67% | 10 | 21 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 2 | 0.44% | 11 | 189 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.22% | 12 | 153 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 184, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.