J.H.S. SORANW R.N.1 PS 224
SURESH KUMAR
COL 2121124 votes at this polling station
over VIMLESH KUMARI (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SURESH KUMAR | COL 21 | 124 | 32.63% | |
| 2 | VIMLESH KUMARI | COL 18 | 104 | 27.37% | |
| 3 | VIJAY KUMAR | COL 15 | 97 | 25.53% | |
| 4 | JITENDAR KUMAR | COL 12 | 46 | 12.11% | |
| 5 | TILAKRAJ | COL 24 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | PUTTI LAL | COL 36 | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | MAHENDRA RAWAT | COL 39 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | SHUSHIL KUMAR | COL 42 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | HARISHCHANDRA | COL 45 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | DINESH KUMAR | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | BABULAL | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SIYARAM | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 380 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 124 | 32.29% | 1 | 324 | Average |
| COL 18 | 104 | 27.08% | 2 | 65 | Average |
| COL 15 | 97 | 25.26% | 3 | 269 | Average |
| COL 12 | 46 | 11.98% | 4 | 58 | Weak |
| COL 24 | 4 | 1.04% | 5 | 182 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 2 | 0.52% | 6 | 247 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.26% | 7 | 315 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.26% | 8 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 275 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 300 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 290 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 309 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 184, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.