P.P. NASEERABAD ROOM N0 1 PS 202
SURESH KUMAR
COL 2121176 votes at this polling station
over VIMLESH KUMARI (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SURESH KUMAR | COL 21 | 176 | 45.71% | |
| 2 | VIMLESH KUMARI | COL 18 | 109 | 28.31% | |
| 3 | VIJAY KUMAR | COL 15 | 79 | 20.52% | |
| 4 | JITENDAR KUMAR | COL 12 | 10 | 2.60% | |
| 5 | TILAKRAJ | COL 24 | 4 | 1.04% | |
| 6 | PUTTI LAL | COL 36 | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 7 | MAHENDRA RAWAT | COL 39 | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | SHUSHIL KUMAR | COL 42 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | BABULAL | COL 30 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | SIYARAM | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | HARISHCHANDRA | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | DINESH KUMAR | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 385 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 176 | 45.48% | 1 | 250 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 109 | 28.17% | 2 | 57 | Average |
| COL 15 | 79 | 20.41% | 3 | 302 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 10 | 2.58% | 4 | 257 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 4 | 1.03% | 5 | 179 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.78% | 6 | 176 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.52% | 7 | 247 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 233 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.26% | 8 | 113 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 300 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 356 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 292 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 184, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.