jkuk ek0Ldwy d0ua01 PS 96
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP387 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 387 | 64.18% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 176 | 29.19% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 28 | 4.64% | |
| 4 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 603 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 387 | 63.55% | 1 | 54 | Strong |
| BJP | 176 | 28.90% | 2 | 300 | Average |
| INC | 28 | 4.60% | 3 | 223 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.82% | 4 | 63 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.49% | 5 | 87 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 122 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 323 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 367 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 105 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 187 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 228 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.