iw0 ek0 fo0 jk;iqj d0ua0 2 PS 95
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP343 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 343 | 63.87% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 116 | 21.60% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 58 | 10.80% | |
| 4 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 9 | 1.68% | |
| 5 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 7 | 1.30% | |
| 6 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 537 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 343 | 62.71% | 1 | 77 | Strong |
| SP | 116 | 21.21% | 2 | 330 | Weak |
| INC | 58 | 10.60% | 3 | 63 | Weak |
| JAP | 9 | 1.65% | 4 | 30 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.28% | 5 | 274 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.55% | 6 | 255 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 231 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 343 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 242 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 227 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.