iw0 ek0 fo0 jk;iqj d0ua0 1 PS 94
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP366 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 366 | 65.12% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 96 | 17.08% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 35 | 6.23% | |
| 4 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 28 | 4.98% | |
| 5 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 16 | 2.85% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 13 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 562 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 366 | 63.65% | 1 | 61 | Strong |
| SP | 96 | 16.70% | 2 | 356 | Weak |
| INC | 35 | 6.09% | 3 | 171 | Poor |
| JAP | 28 | 4.87% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| BSP | 16 | 2.78% | 5 | 181 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.09% | 6 | 48 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.52% | 7 | 23 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 49 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.35% | 9 | 18 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 246 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 104 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.