jk0ck0b0dk0 nsokuUniqj d0ua03 PS 85
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP367 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 367 | 59.39% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 182 | 29.45% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 39 | 6.31% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 14 | 2.27% | |
| 5 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 618 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 367 | 58.72% | 1 | 57 | Strong |
| SP | 182 | 29.12% | 2 | 232 | Average |
| INC | 39 | 6.24% | 3 | 149 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 2.24% | 4 | 200 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.12% | 5 | 125 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.48% | 6 | 13 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.32% | 8 | 130 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 158 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 117 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 110 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 180 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.