izk0fo0 udQqygk d0ua02 PS 81
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP273 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Manish Chauhan (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 273 | 50.37% | |
| 2 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 133 | 24.54% | |
| 3 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 107 | 19.74% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 10 | 1.85% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 6 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 542 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 273 | 50.09% | 1 | 135 | Strong |
| INC | 133 | 24.40% | 2 | 4 | Weak |
| BJP | 107 | 19.63% | 3 | 364 | Weak |
| BSP | 10 | 1.83% | 4 | 235 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.65% | 5 | 83 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.55% | 6 | 92 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 50 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.37% | 8 | 47 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.37% | 9 | 37 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 240 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 178 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.