izk0fo0 dpkSank ukudkjh d0ua01 PS 8
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP397 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 397 | 55.60% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 246 | 34.45% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 32 | 4.48% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 13 | 1.82% | |
| 5 | Raghvendra | HSP | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 7 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 714 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 397 | 54.83% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| SP | 246 | 33.98% | 2 | 162 | Average |
| INC | 32 | 4.42% | 3 | 186 | Poor |
| BSP | 13 | 1.80% | 4 | 206 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.10% | 6 | 94 | Poor |
| HSP | 8 | 1.10% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.41% | 7 | 13 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.41% | 8 | 16 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 31 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 145 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 254 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.